
I'll go ahead and admit it now. I'm a bit of a nerd when it comes to communications and public relations research. I enjoy finding new insights and understanding and applying that to the industry's practice. That's how I found a backbone article of new PR theory, "Building Relationships Between Organizations and Publics: Examining The Linkage Between Organization-Public Relationships, Evaluations of Satisfaction, and Behavioral Intent" from
Communication Studies.
The past several years in public relations have brought change that you might say was both necessary, and natural in our modern society. What use to be the norm of "Press Coverage" measuring a campaign's effectiveness in clippings from several newspapers is now understood to be only part of the story (See this entry from
BuzzNetworker).
Two-way communication, or the Dialogic Approach, embraces the normal context of relationships and applies them to the organization-public scene, "...Relationship management involves effectively managing organization-public relationships around common interests and shared goals, over time, resulting in mutual understanding and benefit for interacting organizations and publics" (Ledingham, 2003).
Many factors have caused us to arrive at this point, such as digital communications, consumer advocates, and corporate social responsibility. I believe that the outcome of public relations practictioners actually managing relationships (not press clippings) has been a big stride ahead for the validity and transparency of the field.
Relationships are what sells a product or service today; not infomercials, marketing ploys, or full-page newspaper ads. Organizations and 'publics' communicating for mutual benefit is what has caused such a stir. CEOs on Twitter? Ford taking on the Breast Cancer cause? Brilliant and honest attempts at two-way communication. This would have been unthinkable a decade ago, that "practitioners develop initiatives centered on the notion of mutual benefit..." Check out the latest effort of a
CBS show at the BuzzNetworker blog.
What some would have once regarded as dangerous to partake in, is actually now dangerous not to. Still sending out your message and pounding your ads in people's faces probably won't sell many widgets. When your company or business doesn't take the time to listen to and interact with its' target market and consumers, costly mistakes can be made that effect "...the economic, social, cultural, or political well-being of the other." Building, developing, and maintaining beneficial relationships can promote success and longevity. The success of such a strategy could be measured in how the organization "...positively influences respondent attitudes about, evaluations of, and behaviors toward..." their brand.
While exchanging resources in the mutual relationship, listening and customization or tailoring is important to cultivating meaningful and lasting relationships. The general idea is to "develop strategies to 'personalize' the organization for the public...communicating both content and relational messages when interacting..." resulting in an overall 'user-friendly' strategy.Relationships instead of messages creates value for both consumer and company and paves the way for a more celebrated approach to public relations strategy.
Thoughts? Horrays? What are some examples you've encountered of business holding on to the traditional, or forging ahead to the new era of relationship-PR?